Who it is for · Agencies
You write the report. It still has to hold up.
Agencies supply what the company rarely can: structure, language, design and a text an outsider can read. What agencies do not supply is the data — or the requirement the text will finally be measured against.
CSRD-GPT ties every passage to its disclosure requirement, with citation and version, and marks what the draft does not yet evidence. Where a figure is missing you get a named placeholder with a task for the client, not a plausible number. Material from different clients stays in separate knowledge spaces. From €49 a month, with no minimum term during the pilot.
Typical questions
What actually slows the drafting down.
Which disclosure requirement does this chapter satisfy?
The mapping from passage to disclosure requirement, with the citation — so that in review it is not the client who has to explain why a paragraph is in the report.
Does this report fall under the 2023 or the 2026 version?
That depends on the client’s financial year and the option taken. Carrying a chapter forward from last year stopped being a safe assumption when the standards were revised.
Is this wording covered by the material?
The comparison between what the draft asserts and what the client has actually evidenced — as a named list, not as a feeling in the final edit.
What is the client still missing?
A gap list with citations that you can hand to the client, instead of another round of questions by email.
How have comparable companies worded this?
Published sustainability reports from listed German companies sit in the collection — as evidence of the range of accepted wording, not as a template to copy.
How does the legal text become readable language?
Translating requirements into the client’s language without the disclosure losing its reference base or its qualification along the way.
Built for this
What is built for working on a client’s behalf.
- A separate knowledge space per client, so material does not travel between accounts
- Passage mapped to disclosure requirement, with a citation for the review at the client
- Named placeholders instead of plausible but invented figures in the draft
- The version (ESRS 2023 or 2026) named on every statement about a requirement
- A reminder that omissions belong in the report with their reasons
- German and English legal texts in the same collection, for bilingual reports
Where the risk sits for an agency
A general-purpose model writes a plausible number where a figure is missing and a confident sentence where a requirement is uncertain. In the draft both look finished. The first place it can surface is assurance — and by then it is on the client’s desk.
A report is not judged on how it is written but on whether the disclosure matches the requirement and is evidenced. That is why CSRD-GPT supplies the citation and leaves the gap visible rather than closing it.
Frequently asked
Does each client’s material stay separate?
On the Premium plan every client gets its own knowledge space; material is not retrieved across spaces and is not used for training. For an agency holding several accounts that separation is what makes it possible to bring material in at all — the contractual side sits in your master agreement with the client.
Does this replace the client’s own advisers?
No. The materiality assessment, the data collection and the decision on what gets reported stay with the company and its advisers. What changes is the drafting: you no longer have to guess which disclosure requirement a chapter satisfies, or which version applies.
Can we work in two languages?
The legal texts are held in German and English in the same collection. You can hold the same passage in both languages against the same requirement, instead of checking a translation against somebody’s recollection.