Who it is for · Consulting
More engagements, without buying in junior capacity.
In small practices and independent work, the largest effort is not in the strategy but in the standards research, the interpretation and the drafting that precede it. That is the time that does not get billed.
CSRD-GPT takes on the evidence-bound preparatory work: finding the citation, applying the requirement to the client’s situation, setting up drafts and gap lists. What separates it from a general model is that you can check the result against the legal text and that client material stays in a separate space. From €49 a month, with no minimum term during the test phase.
Typical questions
What consultants actually ask.
Does the old or the new version apply to this engagement?
The answer depends on the financial year and the option to choose. Get it wrong and you collect data that is no longer required.
What is still missing from the client’s report?
A comparison of existing material against the disclosure requirements — as a gap list with citations, not as general advice.
How do other companies word this?
Published sustainability reports from listed German companies sit in the collection and serve as drafting evidence, not as a template to copy.
How do I explain this to the client?
Translating the standards into advisory language, with concrete next steps rather than a restatement of the legal text.
Which data points are material for this profile?
A first read across the topics, even from sparse information about sector and business model — a starting point for the materiality assessment, not a substitute for it.
What must I document when a topic is not material?
Exclusions belong in the report with their reasoning. The system prompts for it instead of leaving the gap silent.
Built for this
What is built for advisory work.
- Separate knowledge spaces per engagement, so material does not travel between projects
- A citation for every statement, so you can answer for it in front of the client
- Named placeholders instead of invented figures in report drafts
- To-do lists prioritised by materiality and collection effort
- Critical questions about the material you bring in, for instance where the reporting year does not fit
- German and English versions of the legal texts in the same collection
The right comparison
The honest question is not whether a general model can answer a question about sustainability reporting standards — often it can. It is whether you could defend that answer to a client without having looked it up in the legal text yourself first.
That looking-up is precisely the work CSRD-GPT removes, by bringing the citation with it.
Frequently asked
May I bring in client material?
On the Premium plan each engagement gets its own knowledge space; material is not retrieved across spaces and is not used for training. Whether you may bring material in is a matter for your engagement letter — the technical separation is what makes it possible to answer yes at all.
Is it worth it for a sole practitioner?
Starter at €49 a month covers occasional technical questions; Professional at €99 covers running projects with your own documents. The comparison is not a software budget but the time currently lost to standards research that cannot be billed.
Can I work on the report drafts afterwards?
Drafts come with clean heading levels and named placeholders where client data is missing. Export to an editable text format is in progress; for now you take the text out of the application.